skip to main content
skip to main content
Global Search Configuration
C4BYG7

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has reached a historic milestone. After years of debate, it has approved the first globally binding carbon price for shipping — the J9 credit trading plan and fuel standard, voted through at MEPC83. While far from perfect, this agreement marks a turning point in the maritime sector’s decarbonisation journey.

But what does this mean for maritime operators in practice? And why does access to reliable emissions data now matter more than ever?

The IMO’s new carbon pricing framework: Key takeaways

2T9JRG9

The new framework introduces a two-tier credit trading scheme alongside a fuel standard designed to gradually reduce ships' carbon intensity. In essence, vessels will be financially incentivised to lower emissions, while higher-emitting ships will face mounting costs.

Key components include:

  • Carbon Intensity Targets: Ships must reduce their carbon intensity by 65% by 2040.
  • Baseline & Direct Compliance Targets (DCT): Ships emitting above these thresholds will face financial penalties.
  • Carbon Pricing:
    • $380 per tonne CO2e for emissions above the base limit.
    • $100 per tonne CO2e in “remedial units” (RUs) for emissions exceeding the DCT.
  • Credit Trading: Ships emitting below targets generate Surplus Units (SUs) that can be traded or banked.

While this is the first global carbon price for any sector, it is — as Lloyd’s List editorially described — “a faltering step towards net zero”, with initial stringency lower than many had hoped. Yet, it sets a precedent, laying the groundwork for tougher measures in future.

Why this matters to maritime operators

2D0X803

Despite criticism that the scheme “allows for business-as-usual emissions until 2028”, the financial implications are clear. Operators can no longer afford to ignore emissions performance. With the introduction of global and regional regulations, emissions will directly impact:

  • Operational Costs (through carbon pricing penalties)
  • Access to Charters (emissions performance now factors into vessel selection)
  • Financing & Insurance (Poseidon Principles, green loans, underwriting decisions)
  • Market Reputation & ESG Performance

Other regimes, like the EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime, further amplify compliance pressures. FuelEU, for instance, could impose penalties surpassing €7m by 2034 for non-compliant fleets, as reported by Lloyd’s List.

In short, decarbonisation is no longer aspirational, it’s becoming a direct commercial driver.

The data challenge: Why visibility is key

2HXGN5F

The shift to emissions-based compliance demands granular, reliable vessel emissions data. Operators need visibility of both fleet-level and voyage-level emissions to:

  • Assess current and historical performance (CII & AER ratings)
  • Identify compliance risks
  • Support chartering decisions and financing negotiations
  • Manage exposure to carbon pricing schemes
  • Inform decarbonisation strategies

Yet, fragmented data sources and inconsistent methodologies make this challenging. Manual data collection adds time, cost, and increases the risk of errors — precisely when accuracy is critical.

Seasearcher Emissions Data: Simplifying compliance & strategic decision-making

This is where Lloyd’s List Intelligence’s Seasearcher emissions data comes in.

Integrated directly into the Seasearcher platform and accessible via API, our emissions solution provides:

  • CII & AER Ratings: Vessel-level emissions efficiency data, with standardised scoring.
  • Historical Performance Trends: Multi-year data to understand improvement trajectories.
  • Voyage-Level Insights: Operational emissions data linked to specific voyages.

By embedding emissions data into your existing workflows, we remove friction from compliance tracking and enable smarter, data-driven decisions — whether for compliance, business development, or risk assessment.

 

Screenshot 2025-04-22 150059